On Facebook
On Twitter
My Tweets-
Recent Favorites
- Would Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman Have Signed that GMO Letter? From what I have read about him, I am pretty sure that Richard Feynman would not have signed the recent letter in which a large percentage of our living Nobel laureates urged Greenpeace to end its opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMOs)…
- The Absurdity of Claiming that “All GMOs are Safe” In an op-ed piece in The New York Times, Mark Lynas recently wrote that “There is an equivalent level of scientific consensus on both issues…that climate change is real and genetically modified foods are safe.” But comparing the issues …
- Time To Talk “Conflicts of Interest” In Relation to GMOs Scientific conflicts of interest have been in the news a lot lately. For example, a federal judge recently ruled that various members of the FDA’s Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee had conflicts of interest and…
- ag biotech
- agricultural biotechnology
- Agrobacterium
- animal feeding studies
- antibiotic resistance
- Big Food
- Bt corn
- Bt pollen
- Calgene
- CA Right To Know
- CDC
- children
- China
- conflicts of interest
- Coordinated Framework
- corn rootworm
- CRISPR
- Dow Chemical
- EPA
- FDA
- Flavr Savr tomato
- Food Additive laws
- Food and Chemical Toxicology
- GE bananas
- GE corn
- GE Foods
- GE labeling
- genetically engineered food
- genetically engineered sweet corn
- Genetic Engineering
- GE sweet corn
- glyphosate
- GMO
- GMO labeling
- GMO labels
- GMO regulation
- GMOs
- golden rice
- herbicide-resistance
- insertional mutations
- Meat
- Monsanto
- Monsanto's sweet corn
- mutagenic process
- Nature
- Nature Biotechnology
- New York Times
- NK603 corn
- probable carcinogen
- Prop 37
- rat feeding studies
- Regulation of GMOs
- Reuters
- rice
- Richard Feynman
- Roundup
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Science
- Seralini
- StarLinkTM corn
- Substantial Equivalence
- superbugs
- superweeds
- sustainability
- Syngenta
- Technology
- The New York Times
- transparency
- unintended changes in GE crops
- unintended effects
- USDA
- USDA's Plant Pest List
- vitamin A
- WHO
- World Health Organization
Blogroll
Search Biotech Salon
Archives
- September 2025
- July 2023
- November 2020
- February 2020
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- August 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- December 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- May 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
Tag Archives: FDA
Why test GE Bananas on U.S. citizens?
According to a recent NPR article, “Somewhere in Iowa, volunteers are earning $900 apiece by providing blood samples after eating” bananas that have been genetically engineered (GE) to produce levels of pro-vitamin A some 5-6 times higher than levels in … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged animal feeding studies, EPA, FDA, GE bananas, Genetic Engineering, genetically engineered food, GMO regulation, USDA
6 Comments
Is FDA “Regulation” of GE Foods Legal?
Today marks twenty years–to the day–since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) first pronounced a “whole food produced by biotechnology,” Calgene’s Flavr Savr™ tomato, “as safe as tomatoes bred by conventional means.” FDA’s announcement “was accompanied by a new … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged FDA, Flavr SavrTM tomato, Food Additive laws, GE Foods, GMO, Regulation of GMOs
3 Comments
Rebuttal to Statements Against SB 1381, The California GE Labeling Bill
Senator Noreen Evans (D-Santa Rosa) has introduced a bill, SB 1381, which would require genetically engineered (GE) foods in California’s retail grocery stores to be labeled starting in 2016. I’m in favor of this bill because, as stated in its … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Bt corn, FDA, GE labeling, GMO regulation, New York Times, SB 1381, StarLinkTM corn, unintended changes in GE crops
Leave a comment
A Dearth of Life-Long Animal Studies of GE Foods
I’ve been corresponding with individual email-writers and I’ll occasionally post versions of my responses here because they tend to touch upon multiple issues related to genetically engineered (GE) crops in one piece (whereas I usually focus on fewer issues in … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Bt10, Calgene, CDC, Coordinated Framework, EPA, FDA, Food Additive Petition, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Genetic Engineering, genetically engineered food, genetically engineered sweet corn, Monsanto, Monsanto's sweet corn, NK603 corn, Seralini, StarLinkTM corn, Substantial Equivalence, Syngenta, The Lancet, unintended changes in GE crops, USDA, USDA's Plant Pest List
4 Comments
Science-Based Regulation of GE Crops Requires More Long-Term Rat Feeding Studies with NK603 Corn
Although May 2014 will mark the 20th anniversary of the U.S. FDA’s approval for and Calgene’s market launch of the world’s first commercially available genetically engineered (GE) whole food, the Flavr SavrTM tomato, it’s amazing how relevant that GE tomato … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Bt corn, Bt pollen, Calgene, EPA, FDA, Flavr Savr tomato, Monarch butterfly larvae, Monsanto, NK603 corn, rat feeding studies, Seralini, StarLink corn, unintended effects, USDA
17 Comments
How Slate.com botched a story about genetically modified food
A few days ago, Jon Entine posted a story on Slate.com reporting that Caitlin Shetterly’s feature in Elle magazine on genetically engineered (GE) corn (AKA genetically modified, or GM, corn) “just doesn’t withstand the critical scrutiny of science.” But Entine’s … Continue reading
Should Monsanto be the Target?
As I read about the protests held against Monsanto worldwide recently, I found myself wondering: is Monsanto the appropriate target for these protests? I know there are reasons people are unhappy with Monsanto. One is that during California’s most recent … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Big Ag, Big Food, campaign funding, FDA, Flavr Savr tomato, GE labeling, Genetic Engineering, GMO regulation, GMOs, Labeling GE Foods, Monsanto, Obama, Prop 37, USDA
2 Comments
Crop Genetic Engineering, Warts and All
This is a paper I wrote that was published by PBGworks October 26, 2012: Crop genetic engineering is a powerful technology that is helping scientists reveal how genes and genomes function. It could also be used to solve important global … Continue reading
Corrections to San Francisco Chronicle article
I wrote the following letter in response to an article on California’s Prop 37 written by Stacy Finz in the San Francisco Chronicle; it was published in The Davis Enterprise on August 24, 2012. First, there are currently no crops … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged EPA, FDA, mutagenic process, Nature Biotechnology, New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle, superweeds, USDA
2 Comments
Open Letter to the American Medical Association
It is striking that nowhere in AMA document H-480.958, amended June 2012, is it mentioned that both of the major methods currently utilized to genetically engineer crop plants are highly mutagenic processes. Foreign genes transferred from one organism to another … Continue reading
Biotech Salon 