On Facebook
On Twitter
My Tweets-
Recent Favorites
- Would Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman Have Signed that GMO Letter? From what I have read about him, I am pretty sure that Richard Feynman would not have signed the recent letter in which a large percentage of our living Nobel laureates urged Greenpeace to end its opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMOs)…
- The Absurdity of Claiming that “All GMOs are Safe” In an op-ed piece in The New York Times, Mark Lynas recently wrote that “There is an equivalent level of scientific consensus on both issues…that climate change is real and genetically modified foods are safe.” But comparing the issues …
- Time To Talk “Conflicts of Interest” In Relation to GMOs Scientific conflicts of interest have been in the news a lot lately. For example, a federal judge recently ruled that various members of the FDA’s Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee had conflicts of interest and…
- ag biotech
- agricultural biotechnology
- Agrobacterium
- animal feeding studies
- antibiotic resistance
- Big Food
- Bt corn
- Bt pollen
- Calgene
- CA Right To Know
- CDC
- children
- China
- conflicts of interest
- Coordinated Framework
- corn rootworm
- CRISPR
- Dow Chemical
- EPA
- FDA
- Flavr Savr tomato
- Food Additive laws
- Food and Chemical Toxicology
- GE bananas
- GE corn
- GE Foods
- GE labeling
- genetically engineered food
- genetically engineered sweet corn
- Genetic Engineering
- GE sweet corn
- glyphosate
- GMO
- GMO labeling
- GMO labels
- GMO regulation
- GMOs
- golden rice
- herbicide-resistance
- insertional mutations
- Meat
- Monsanto
- Monsanto's sweet corn
- mutagenic process
- Nature
- Nature Biotechnology
- New York Times
- NK603 corn
- probable carcinogen
- Prop 37
- rat feeding studies
- Regulation of GMOs
- Reuters
- rice
- Richard Feynman
- Roundup
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Science
- Seralini
- StarLinkTM corn
- Substantial Equivalence
- superbugs
- superweeds
- sustainability
- Syngenta
- Technology
- The New York Times
- transparency
- unintended changes in GE crops
- unintended effects
- USDA
- USDA's Plant Pest List
- vitamin A
- WHO
- World Health Organization
Blogroll
Search Biotech Salon
Archives
- November 2020
- February 2020
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- August 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- December 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- May 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
Tag Archives: Flavr Savr tomato
Gene Editing’s Extra DNA Problem: Déjà Vu All Over Again
UC Davis researcher Alison Van Eenennaam described the experience of learning that the “poster animals for the gene-editing revolution” do not, after all, comprise the “same outcome [that] could be achieved by breeding in the farmyard,” like she and her collaborators … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged ag biotech, Agrobacterium, Alison Van Eenennaam, antibiotic resistance, Calgene, CRISPR, FDA, Flavr Savr tomato, Genetic Engineering, genetically engineered food, GMO, Meat, Nature Biotechnology, Plant Cell, Recombinetics, Regulation of GMOs, Science, Technology, UC Davis, unintended changes in GE crops, unintended effects, USDA
2 Comments
Food Evolution Film Neglects to Mention Important Facts…Like Glyphosate is a Probable Human Carcinogen
The film Food Evolution, despite being narrated by Neil deGrasse Tyson, has been called “a slick piece of GMO propaganda” by Marion Nestle, a prominent nutrition scientist at NYU who was interviewed for it. In response to Nestle’s tweet on … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Bruce Chassy, Calgene, Charles Benbrook, David Shaw, FDA, Flavr Savr tomato, Food Evolution, Fred Gould, Genetic Engineering, genetically engineered food, glyphosate, GMO, IARC, Kevin Folta, Marion Nestle, Michael Pollan, Monsanto, Nature, New York Times, NK603 corn, propaganda, rat feeding studies, Regulation of GMOs, Richard Feynman, Roundup, San Francisco Chronicle, Seralini, transparency, World Health Organization
4 Comments
Monsanto, Henry Miller, and the FDA
I have been reading with interest various articles reporting on the trove of internal documents obtained from Monsanto during the discovery phase of a federal multidistrict litigation against that company that is currently pending in the United States. (The documents, … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged EPA, FDA, Flavr Savr tomato, Forbes, Genetic Engineering, glyphosate, GMOs, Henry Miller, Monsanto, New York Times, Regulation of GMOs, Roundup, Science, The Nation
5 Comments
Kudos to Campbell Soup for Supporting Mandatory Federal GMO Labeling
As announced in a company press release and reported by The New York Times on January 8, Campbell Soup Company is calling for mandatory federal labeling of foods “that may contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs)….“[Such foods/ingredients are also known as … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Calgene, FDA, Flavr Savr tomato, GE labeling, Genetic Engineering, genetically engineered food, GMOs, Prop 37
2 Comments
Exposure of Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Land-Phase Amphibians to Dow Agrosciences’ Pesticide Cocktail?
I’ve already expressed my concern over the fact that U.S. government agencies recently unleashed a ticking bomb with regard to the genetically engineered (GE) “superweed” problem we’re already experiencing in the United States when the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged EPA, Flavr Savr tomato, GE corn, Genetic Engineering, herbicide-resistance, superweeds, sustainability, USDA
2 Comments
Hyper-propagandizing crop genetic engineering in The New Yorker?
I was very disappointed with Michael Specter’s recent piece in The New Yorker called “Seeds of Doubt: An activist’s controversial crusade against genetically modified crops.” For one thing, Specter didn’t seem to understand the basics of crop genetic engineering (GE) itself, … Continue reading
Twenty Years Ago Today Biotech Food was Commercially Launched
Today is the 20th anniversary of the first sales of the world’s first genetically engineered (GE), commercially available, whole food: the Flavr Savr™ tomato. High-end Flavr Savrs, dubbed “MacGregor’s®” tomatoes, available that day at the State Market IGA in Davis, … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Calgene, Flavr Savr tomato, GE labeling, Genetic Engineering, genetically engineered food, GMO labels
2 Comments
Science-Based Regulation of GE Crops Requires More Long-Term Rat Feeding Studies with NK603 Corn
Although May 2014 will mark the 20th anniversary of the U.S. FDA’s approval for and Calgene’s market launch of the world’s first commercially available genetically engineered (GE) whole food, the Flavr SavrTM tomato, it’s amazing how relevant that GE tomato … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Bt corn, Bt pollen, Calgene, EPA, FDA, Flavr Savr tomato, Monarch butterfly larvae, Monsanto, NK603 corn, rat feeding studies, Seralini, StarLink corn, unintended effects, USDA
17 Comments
Should Monsanto be the Target?
As I read about the protests held against Monsanto worldwide recently, I found myself wondering: is Monsanto the appropriate target for these protests? I know there are reasons people are unhappy with Monsanto. One is that during California’s most recent … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Big Ag, Big Food, campaign funding, FDA, Flavr Savr tomato, GE labeling, Genetic Engineering, GMO regulation, GMOs, Labeling GE Foods, Monsanto, Obama, Prop 37, USDA
2 Comments
Crop Genetic Engineering, Warts and All
This is a paper I wrote that was published by PBGworks October 26, 2012: Crop genetic engineering is a powerful technology that is helping scientists reveal how genes and genomes function. It could also be used to solve important global … Continue reading