On Facebook
On Twitter
My Tweets-
Recent Favorites
- Would Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman Have Signed that GMO Letter? From what I have read about him, I am pretty sure that Richard Feynman would not have signed the recent letter in which a large percentage of our living Nobel laureates urged Greenpeace to end its opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMOs)…
- The Absurdity of Claiming that “All GMOs are Safe” In an op-ed piece in The New York Times, Mark Lynas recently wrote that “There is an equivalent level of scientific consensus on both issues…that climate change is real and genetically modified foods are safe.” But comparing the issues …
- Time To Talk “Conflicts of Interest” In Relation to GMOs Scientific conflicts of interest have been in the news a lot lately. For example, a federal judge recently ruled that various members of the FDA’s Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee had conflicts of interest and…
- ag biotech
- agricultural biotechnology
- Agrobacterium
- animal feeding studies
- antibiotic resistance
- Big Food
- Bt corn
- Bt pollen
- Calgene
- CA Right To Know
- CDC
- children
- China
- conflicts of interest
- Coordinated Framework
- corn rootworm
- CRISPR
- Dow Chemical
- EPA
- FDA
- Flavr Savr tomato
- Food Additive laws
- Food and Chemical Toxicology
- GE bananas
- GE corn
- GE Foods
- GE labeling
- genetically engineered food
- genetically engineered sweet corn
- Genetic Engineering
- GE sweet corn
- glyphosate
- GMO
- GMO labeling
- GMO labels
- GMO regulation
- GMOs
- golden rice
- herbicide-resistance
- insertional mutations
- Meat
- Monsanto
- Monsanto's sweet corn
- mutagenic process
- Nature
- Nature Biotechnology
- New York Times
- NK603 corn
- probable carcinogen
- Prop 37
- rat feeding studies
- Regulation of GMOs
- Reuters
- rice
- Richard Feynman
- Roundup
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Science
- Seralini
- StarLinkTM corn
- Substantial Equivalence
- superbugs
- superweeds
- sustainability
- Syngenta
- Technology
- The New York Times
- transparency
- unintended changes in GE crops
- unintended effects
- USDA
- USDA's Plant Pest List
- vitamin A
- WHO
- World Health Organization
Blogroll
Search Biotech Salon
Archives
- November 2020
- February 2020
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- August 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- December 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- May 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
Tag Archives: FDA
In Light of Big Mistakes Made by Developers of “Poster Child” GMO Products like Hornless Cattle and Golden Rice, FDA is Justified in Requiring Regulation
Earlier this month, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published its analysis of what has been touted as the “Poster Child” of gene-edited animals: cattle genetically engineered (GE) to prevent them from developing horns. As mentioned in an … Continue reading
Gene Editing’s Extra DNA Problem: Déjà Vu All Over Again
UC Davis researcher Alison Van Eenennaam described the experience of learning that the “poster animals for the gene-editing revolution” do not, after all, comprise the “same outcome [that] could be achieved by breeding in the farmyard,” like she and her collaborators … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged ag biotech, Agrobacterium, Alison Van Eenennaam, antibiotic resistance, Calgene, CRISPR, FDA, Flavr Savr tomato, Genetic Engineering, genetically engineered food, GMO, Meat, Nature Biotechnology, Plant Cell, Recombinetics, Regulation of GMOs, Science, Technology, UC Davis, unintended changes in GE crops, unintended effects, USDA
2 Comments
U.S. Grain Industry Believes USDA APHIS’s “New Proposed Rule [for regulating GMOs] Is Fundamentally Flawed”
I’ve got to give credit to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) for persistence. USDA APHIS has proposed new rules for regulating genetically engineered (GE) crop plants (AKA genetically modified organisms: GMOs) … Continue reading
Disappointment in the First 25 Years of GMO Foods
The world’s first, commercially available GMO (genetically modified organism) created for human or animal food was first sold in U.S. grocery stores twenty-five years ago today. I can still remember the excitement my colleagues and I at Calgene, Inc. felt as … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged children, China, FDA, Genetic Engineering, GMO, Monsanto, New York Times, Reuters, rice, Roundup, Science, sustainability, Technology, transparency, USDA, vitamin A
1 Comment
New Salk Institute Study Reveals More Detailed Picture of “Scrambled Nature” of Gene Insertions in GMOs
Plant molecular biologists have known for decades that the techniques they use to genetically engineer plants are error prone and can result in GMOs with unintended: mutations in host plant genes, insertion of vector backbone DNA sequences, small duplications or … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Agrobacterium, FDA, Genetic Engineering, insertional mutations, Monsanto, mutagenic process, NK603 corn, Regulation of GMOs, Science, Technology
1 Comment
Golden Rice Showcases Both the Potential Benefits and Potential Risks of Crop Genetic Engineering
It’s been nearly two years since a group of Nobel laureates published a letter supporting “Precision Agriculture (GMOs)” and, more specifically, Golden Rice, the genetic engineering project first embarked upon in the mid-1990’s to “reduce or eliminate much of the … Continue reading
Food Evolution Film Neglects to Mention Important Facts…Like Glyphosate is a Probable Human Carcinogen
The film Food Evolution, despite being narrated by Neil deGrasse Tyson, has been called “a slick piece of GMO propaganda” by Marion Nestle, a prominent nutrition scientist at NYU who was interviewed for it. In response to Nestle’s tweet on … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Bruce Chassy, Calgene, Charles Benbrook, David Shaw, FDA, Flavr Savr tomato, Food Evolution, Fred Gould, Genetic Engineering, genetically engineered food, glyphosate, GMO, IARC, Kevin Folta, Marion Nestle, Michael Pollan, Monsanto, Nature, New York Times, NK603 corn, propaganda, rat feeding studies, Regulation of GMOs, Richard Feynman, Roundup, San Francisco Chronicle, Seralini, transparency, World Health Organization
4 Comments
Update on “Extra DNA” and Other Problems with Crop Genetic Engineering
I received an email recently from a distinguished professor of plant sciences who encouraged me to update my knowledge of the “extra DNA” problem I mentioned in an article published in the January 2018 issue of Comstocks magazine. He sent me … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged FDA, Genetic Engineering, genetically engineered food, GMOs, herbicide-resistance, Monsanto, Nature, NK603 corn, rat feeding studies, Seralini
3 Comments
Monsanto, Henry Miller, and the FDA
I have been reading with interest various articles reporting on the trove of internal documents obtained from Monsanto during the discovery phase of a federal multidistrict litigation against that company that is currently pending in the United States. (The documents, … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged EPA, FDA, Flavr Savr tomato, Forbes, Genetic Engineering, glyphosate, GMOs, Henry Miller, Monsanto, New York Times, Regulation of GMOs, Roundup, Science, The Nation
5 Comments
Transparent Information about the GMO Ingredient(s) in the “Impossible Burger”
Have you heard about this new non-meat burger that—due to an ingredient produced in a genetically engineered (GE) yeast—has a taste and “blood” like what you would expect from the real thing? Or, since they are already commercially available for … Continue reading