On Facebook
On Twitter
My Tweets-
Recent Favorites
- Would Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman Have Signed that GMO Letter? From what I have read about him, I am pretty sure that Richard Feynman would not have signed the recent letter in which a large percentage of our living Nobel laureates urged Greenpeace to end its opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMOs)…
- The Absurdity of Claiming that “All GMOs are Safe” In an op-ed piece in The New York Times, Mark Lynas recently wrote that “There is an equivalent level of scientific consensus on both issues…that climate change is real and genetically modified foods are safe.” But comparing the issues …
- Time To Talk “Conflicts of Interest” In Relation to GMOs Scientific conflicts of interest have been in the news a lot lately. For example, a federal judge recently ruled that various members of the FDA’s Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee had conflicts of interest and…
- ag biotech
- agricultural biotechnology
- Agrobacterium
- animal feeding studies
- antibiotic resistance
- Big Food
- Bt corn
- Bt pollen
- Calgene
- CA Right To Know
- CDC
- children
- China
- conflicts of interest
- Coordinated Framework
- corn rootworm
- CRISPR
- Dow Chemical
- EPA
- FDA
- Flavr Savr tomato
- Food Additive laws
- Food and Chemical Toxicology
- GE bananas
- GE corn
- GE Foods
- GE labeling
- genetically engineered food
- genetically engineered sweet corn
- Genetic Engineering
- GE sweet corn
- glyphosate
- GMO
- GMO labeling
- GMO labels
- GMO regulation
- GMOs
- golden rice
- herbicide-resistance
- insertional mutations
- Meat
- Monsanto
- Monsanto's sweet corn
- mutagenic process
- Nature
- Nature Biotechnology
- New York Times
- NK603 corn
- probable carcinogen
- Prop 37
- rat feeding studies
- Regulation of GMOs
- Reuters
- rice
- Richard Feynman
- Roundup
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Science
- Seralini
- StarLinkTM corn
- Substantial Equivalence
- superbugs
- superweeds
- sustainability
- Syngenta
- Technology
- The New York Times
- transparency
- unintended changes in GE crops
- unintended effects
- USDA
- USDA's Plant Pest List
- vitamin A
- WHO
- World Health Organization
Blogroll
Search Biotech Salon
Archives
- November 2020
- February 2020
- September 2019
- August 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- August 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- December 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- May 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
Tag Archives: Substantial Equivalence
Transparent Information about the GMO Ingredient(s) in the “Impossible Burger”
Have you heard about this new non-meat burger that—due to an ingredient produced in a genetically engineered (GE) yeast—has a taste and “blood” like what you would expect from the real thing? Or, since they are already commercially available for … Continue reading
A Dearth of Life-Long Animal Studies of GE Foods
I’ve been corresponding with individual email-writers and I’ll occasionally post versions of my responses here because they tend to touch upon multiple issues related to genetically engineered (GE) crops in one piece (whereas I usually focus on fewer issues in … Continue reading
Posted in Biotechnology
Tagged Bt10, Calgene, CDC, Coordinated Framework, EPA, FDA, Food Additive Petition, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Genetic Engineering, genetically engineered food, genetically engineered sweet corn, Monsanto, Monsanto's sweet corn, NK603 corn, Seralini, StarLinkTM corn, Substantial Equivalence, Syngenta, The Lancet, unintended changes in GE crops, USDA, USDA's Plant Pest List
4 Comments
Biotech Salon 